Sign Up for Logo's
Monthly Newsletter
Hillary Exercises the Tonya Harding Option

nancy-kerrigan-tonya-harding-21794.jpg

Watch your back, Barack; Hillary’s closing in on you, and she may have a crowbar.

You don’t have to be a figure skating aficionado to remember Tonya Harding and the notorious incident in which one of her henchmen took a crowbar and kneecapped her rival Nancy Kerrigan to try to put her out of the competition for the in 1994 Olympics in Norway. January 6 was a day that will live in infamy in the annals of Olympic sports competition. Only two months later, on March 16, Harding pleaded guilty to hindering the investigation of the Jan. 6 attack on in a plea bargain to avoid prison time, and on June 30 of that year, Harding was stripped of her 1994 national championship and banned from the U.S. Figure Skating Association (USFSA) for life. The attack and the subsequent legal drama made national news and made Harding possibly the most hated sports figure of the decade.

Harding’s ex-husband, Jeff Gillooly, also pleaded guilty, implicating her only after discovering that she had tried to blame the attack on him. On March 17 of that year, Washington Post reporter Johnette Howard wrote, “The intervening three months have been an almost unrelenting soap opera, with Kerrigan being portrayed as America’s sweetheart, Harding a ruthless competitor who just might be capable of anything, and hit men Shawn Eckardt, Derrick Smith and Shane Stant revealed as bumbling goofs.”

America’s sweetheart? Ruthless competitor? Bumbling goofs? Sound familiar…?

“Her securing the nomination is certainly possible - but it will require exercising the ‘Tonya Harding option,’” a Democratic Party official said of Hillary Clinton. Speaking to Jake Tapper (ABC News senior national correspondent) on condition of anonymity, the official asked, “Is that really what we Democrats want?”

“The Tonya Harding Option — the first time I’ve heard it put that way,” writes Tapper on his ‘Political Punch’ blog on the ABC News website. “It implies that Clinton is so set on ensuring that Obama doesn’t get the nomination, not only is she willing to take extra-ruthless steps, but in the end neither she nor Obama win the gold,” Tapper continues. “In this metaphor, presumably, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., would be Oksana Baiul,” he adds. “Does that make former President Bill Clinton Jeff Gillooly?”

Dubbed ‘America’s sweetheart,’ Nancy Kerrigan was the natural champion. It was not simply the figure skater’s beauty, but the natural magnetism and charisma that she radiated. So if we take up the metaphor being proffered by this anonymous Democratic official, then for Nancy Kerrigan, read ‘Barack Obama.’

Ruthless competitor? Speaking of Hillary Clinton, the Democratic Party official said, “She will have to ‘break his back.” In order to take the nomination from Obama, the official tells Jay Tapper, “She will have to destroy Obama, make Obama completely unacceptable.”

Bumbling goofs? “Smith allegedly hired Stant, at Eckardt’s direction, to hit Kerrigan in the knee with a collapsible metal baton after a practice session Jan. 6,” the Washington Post reported on January 15 of that year.

For Shawn Eckardt, Derrick Smith and Shane Stant, read Mark Penn, Harold Ickes and James Carville. Hillary’s hit men are just as willing to wield the crowbar, and while no one would call Ickes — much less Carville — a ‘bumbling goof,’ the appellation does seem to fit the hapless Penn, who crafted the “Hillary’s nomination is inevitable” strategy that has served her so badly. Penn also appears to be the genius behind the “only big states count” strategy that now has Hillary behind Obama in the pledged delegate count by around 150 (depending on who’s counting) and apparently unable to close the gap, even with a big win in Pennsylvania on April 22.

In the end, of course, Harding was able to deprive Kerrigan of the gold, even if Harding herself only placed a distant eighth at Hamar.

“Fifty days after being clubbed on the knee, Kerrigan gave the most scintillating performance of her career in the women’s figure skating competition at the Olympic Amphitheatre, but missed the gold medal by the closest margin possible: .10 of a point in a 5-4 decision by the judges,” Christine Brennan reported from the 1994 Olympics in Norway for the Post on February 26.

Harding’s conduct “intentionally undermines the concept of sportsmanship and fair play embodied in the USFSA bylaws and rules and amateur sportsmanship in general,” the five-member USFSA panel declared in banning her for life. “Ms. Harding’s actions as they related to the assault on Nancy Kerrigan evidence a clear disregard for fairness, good sportsmanship and ethical behavior,” the panel added.

Kerrigan won the silver medal, as well as the hearts of everyone in Hamar, but thanks to the handiwork of Harding and her henchmen, it was Oksana Baiul, as everyone knows, who won the gold.

You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.
Comments
  1. As each day goes by we see further confirming evidence of the Tonya Harding option being exercised by Hillary Clinton and her surrogates. Just the other day a new poll (Wall Street Journal/NBC joint poll?) was released showing that in the last two weeks the positive rating for HRC dropped eight points to an all-time low of only 30+ percent.

    And now we see the big-moneyed Clinton supporters attempting to strong arm Nancy Pelosi from saying anything that could be construed as supportive of Obama? And we see James Carville branding superdelegates who come out in favor of Obama as traitors and Judas?

    At what point do continued supporters of Hillary realize that the ends do not justify the means, and the corrupt means that are integral to the Clinton strategy for victory simply cannot be supported regardless of how much one otherwise agrees with her substantive policies?

    Frankly, I never understood support for HRC; her substantive policies are derivative of Republican values, and her strategic means are those employed by scum like Roy Cohn, Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon. It's creepy; really, really creepy.
  2. Jen, Good points, all. There are observers who believe that Hillary knows that she can't win the nomination but is determined to do as much damage to Obama to prevent him from winning the general election in November so that she can run against McCain in 2012.
  3. I think you may be right Pauline. Hillary and Bill are power hungry Machiavellian politicians and they will stop it nothing to achieve and maintain power. For them "the ends justify the means" even if it damages the Democratic Party, or hurts the American people. If she continues on her mutually destructive path, the Democratic convention will turn into a repeat of the bloody 1968 Chicago convention because now instead of just the Vietnam War and draft the issues will be the Iraq War, race and disenfranchisement for the majority of Democrats who caucused, or voted for Obama in the primaries. This will lead to riots on the convention floor that will very well spill into the streets should Hillary get the nomination because of the "Super Delegate Pundits" of the Democratic party. Like in 1968 the division within the party over the war and Hubert Humphrey "handed" the election to the Republican Richard Nixon. We all know how that turned out! In this case, through her self serving actions and by the aiding and abetting of the Party, they will once again "hand" the Republican's the presidency with "More of the same McCain" and the country and the American people will once again suffer with 8 more years of Bushie "right wing nut" Neo -Con type policies. And we all know what that means for the LGBT community, don't we! What a waste: Leave it to the Democrats to "shoot themselves in the foot and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory!"
  4. Simply bad. You can do better.
  5. Sarcastic, tedious, hyper-opinionated, unbalanced, patronizing, condescending, unprofessional, immature.... sound familiar? Oh, it must be another Pauline Park column.
  6. Perhaps the Clinton supporters can see through all the B.S. They are educated enough to know that ALL the candidates are have baggage, that they will ALL say and do whatever they need to in order to win and that if you REALLY are educated enough beyond columns like this one - that you will see that Clinton is without doubt the better candidate.
  7. Brent, I'm not in the least bit surprised; most LGBT Democratic clubs have endorsed Hillary. I think the more interesting issue is why.
  8. Oh yeah, now I know why I liked Tonya Harding!

    Hey Pauline, here is a headline for you!


    "Hillary Clinton’s getting all sorts of gay love in The Keystone State:

    Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton won the endorsement Monday of the Liberty City Democratic Club, Philadelphia’s largest gay political group.

    That boosts her support among gay voters at a time when polls show her ahead of rival presidential contender Barack Obama in Pennsylvania’s Democratic primary set for April 22.

    The Clinton endorsement by the Liberty City gay Democratic group came a few weeks after a gay Pittsburgh group, the Steel City Democrats, also gave its endorsement to Clinton."
  9. Hillary reminds me of that line from the old song:

    It's my party, and I'll destroy it if I want to.
Leave a Comment

*
To prove that you're not a bot, enter this code
Anti-Spam Image

The Visible Vote ’08 Widget
Post our headlines on your blog


Customize/resize this widget

Disclaimer:
The opinions expressed on the blog are the personal opinions of our bloggers, and in no way reflect the opinions of Logo, MTV Networks or Viacom.

Warning:
Some blogs or websites linked from this site may contain objectionable or uncensored content. Logo is not affiliated with these websites and makes no representations or warranties as to their content.